CAMEL VARIABLES AND MALAYSIAN BANKS PERFORMANCE

International Journal of Business Society, Vol. 2, Issue 4
Idris MukhtarDr. Fauzias Mat NorAinna Bint RamliDr. Azrul Azlan Bin Iskandar Mirza
BanksFinanceLiquidityPerformanceProfitability
PDFRegular IssueDOI: 10.30566/ijo-bs/2018.284
2Volume
4Issue

Abstract

One of the main driver to good economy is Banking system. Without an efficient banking system, there is a risk for whole failure in the economy with the resultant consequences of high cost of living, unemployment, inflation, falling value of currencies etc. Many studies in past examines factors that effects the bank’s profitability, using both internal and external factors that affect the banks performance. However, the findings in these studies indicates a different result at different times within the same jurisdictions. This paper will close this gap by finding out the result of the internal factors that affect Malaysian Islamic and conventional banks performance during the period between 2008-2016. The study used secondary data from (Fitch connect databases) to evaluate the internal variable (CAMEL) and the return on equity (ROE) as dependent variables, Stata Econometrics software through panel data was used for analysis. The findings of the study show contrary result from the anticipated, it shows that the newly introduced long-term liquidity measured (NSFR) did not significantly affect the Malaysian Banks performance as measured by ROE. Thus, the future study should focus to find whether NSFR has effect of banks profitability through other internal of external factors (i.e. mediating/interactions effects of NSFR and banks performance). The implication of the study is twofold; first it serves as avenue for policy makers to find out more issues that leads to the 2008 financial crisis, second, researchers in the banking sectors will use it as a gap for further research in this area.

References

[1]

Abdus Samad & M. Kabir Hassan. (1999). “The Per formance of Malaysian Islamic Bank During 1984 -1997: An Exploratory Study”. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services. Vol. 1. (3).

[2]

Ahmad and Hassan, (2007). Regulation and Performance of Islamic Banking in Bangladesh.Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev, 49 (2007), pp. 251- 277

[3]

Ahmad Azam Sulaiman @ Mohamad et al. 2013. “How Islamic Banks of Malaysia Managing Liquidity? An Emphasis on Confronting Economic Cycles”. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 4. (7): p. 253- 263.

[4]

Ahmad Mokhtar, H. S., Abdullah, N. & Alhabshi, S.M. (2008), “Efficiency and Competition of Islamic Banking in Malaysia”, Humanomics, 24(1), 28-48.

[5]

Ahmed Arif & Ahmad Nauman Anees. 2012. “Liquidity Risk and Performance of Banking System”. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance . Vol. 20. (2): p. 182- 195.

[6]

Ainley M.L; Mashayekhi A.; Hicks R.; Rahman A. and Ravalia A. (2007). “Islamic Finance in the UK: Regulation and Challenges”, Financial Services Authority, London, UK.

[7]

Aisyah Abdul -Rahman et al. 2017. “Financing Structure and Liquidity Risk : Lesson from Malaysian experience”. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice. Vol. 2. (595): p. 125- 148.

[8]

Angelini, P et al. 2011. “BASEL III: Long -term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations”. BIS Working Papers No. 338.

[9]

Angora, A. & Roulet, C. 2011. Transformation risk and its determinants: A new approach based on the Basel III liquidity management framework. Universite de Limoges.

[10]

Anjum Iqbal. 2012. “Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan”. Global Journal of Management and Business Research.

[11]

Anna P. I. Vong and Hoi Si Chan (2009), Determinants of Bank Profitability in Macao: Macao Monetary Research Bulletin

[12]

Anup, A. H., 2009, ‘Economic Crisis a nd the Overview’, New Straits Times, 21 March 2012.

[13]

Asim Abdullah & Abdul Qayyum Khan. 2012. “Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Domestic and Foreign Banks in Pakistan”. Journal of Managerial Science .

[14]

Asma’ Rashidah Idris et al. 2011. “Determinant of Islamic Banking Institutions’ Profitability in Malaysia”. World Applied Sciences Journal.

[15]

Sayedul Anam et al. 2012. “Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Bangladesh”. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT.

[16]

Shaista Wasiuzzaman & Hanimas-Ayu Ahmad Tarmizi. 2010. “Profitability of Islamic Banks in Malaysia: An Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance.

[17]

Solé, Juan, (2007) Prospects and Challenges for Developing Bond and Sukuk Markets in Kuwait,” Selected Issues Paper SM/07/84 , (Washington: IMF).

[18]

Sundararajan, Vasudevan, and Luca Errico, 2002, “Islamic Financial Institutions and Pr oducts in the Global Financial System: Key Issues in Risk Management and Challenges Ahead,” IMF Working Paper No. 02/192 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

[19]

Vazquez, F. & P. Federico. 2012. “Bank Funding Structures and Risk: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis”. IMF Working Paper. WP/12/19.

[20]

Javid, A. & R. Iqbal. 2008. “Ownership Concentrations, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan”. Pakistan Economic Review .

[21]

Jobst, Andreas (2007), The Economics of Islamic Finance and Securitization (May 2007). IMF Working Papers, Vol., pp. 1-35, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=986814

[22]

Khoon, G.S. & M.M. Lim. (2010). “The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis: The Case of Malaysia.” Third World Netw ork Global Economy Series No 26.

[23]

Lau, M. S., (2008), ‘The Recent Crisis: Economic Review’, New Straits Times, 3rd April 2012.

[24]

Bank for International Settlements. 2010a. Basel III: International Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards and Monitoring. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

[25]

Bank for International Settlements. 2010b. An Assessment of the Long -Term Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. August 2010.

[26]

Bank Negara Malaysia (2008), Financial Stability and Payment System Report

[27]

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2013a. A brief history of the Basel Committee. <http://www.bis.org/bcbs/history.pdf > accessed 28 March 2018.

[28]

Bashir, A. H. M. (2003). Determinants of profitability in Islamic banks: Some evidence from the Middle East. Islamic economic studies, 11(1), 31- 57.

[29]

Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphrey, and L. B. Pulley (1997), “Do Consumers Pay for One-Stop Banking? Evidence from an Alternative Revenue Function,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 21

[30]

Berger, A.N. & C. Bouwman. 2009. “Bank Liquidity Creation”. The Review of Financial Studies.

[31]

Berger, A.N. & C.H.S. Bouwman. 2008. Financial Crises and Bank Liquidity Creation.

[32]

Blundell, R.W. & S.R. Bond 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions In Dynamic Panel Data Models”. Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 87. (1): p. 115- 143.

[33]

Bologna, P. 2011. “Is There a Role for Funding in Explaining Recent U.S. Banks’ Failures?” IMF Working Paper 11/180.

[34]

Khoon, G.S. & M.M. Lim. (2010). The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis: The Case of Malaysia. Third World Network Global Economy Series No 26.

[35]

Noraini Mohd Ariffin. 2012. “Liquidity Risk Management and Financial Performance In Malaysia: Empirical Evidence From Islamic Banks”. Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences.

Article Information

Article Details
Volume & IssueVol. 2, Iss. 4
Publication DateSep 1, 2018
Authors
Idris Mukhtar
Dr. Fauzias Mat Nor
Ainna Bint Ramli
Dr. Azrul Azlan Bin Iskandar Mirza
DOI
10.30566/ijo-bs/2018.284
PDF Download
CAMEL VARIABLES AND MALAYSIAN BANKS PERFORMANCE | International Journal of Business Society